Mitchell v. Forsyth
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
472 U.S. 511 (1985)
MITCHELL
v.
FORSYTH
No. 84-335.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued February 27, 1985
Decided June 19, 1985
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Deputy Solicitor General Bator argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Lee, Acting Assistant Attorney General Willard, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Barbara L. Herwig, Gorden W. Daiger, and Larry L. Gregg.
David Rudovsky argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Michael Avery.
2Opinion of the Court · WhiteJustice White
This is a suit for damages stemming from a warrantless wiretap authorized by…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Burger; Concurrence · O'Connor; Concurring in the judgment; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
3Cases cited63 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- Merritt Sharp, III v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Maria Morales v. Sonya FryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Correll Thomas v. C. DillardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Wendy Pauluk v. Glenn SavageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Callie Maidhof v. Mitchell CelayaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.