Legal Opinion
State v. Wolfe
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 7, 1983No. TC C81-02-31165 CA A22248 SC 29369, TC C81-02-31261 CA A22389 SC 29369PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
These two cases were consolidated for the first time on the petition for review. Defendant was convicted of rape and kidnapping in one case and robbery and kidnapping in the other case. He appealed, contending that because he answered questions before the police officer gave him the necessary Miranda 1 warnings, the evidence found as a result of the consent he gave to search following this questioning should be suppressed because the consent was not voluntary. We agree.
On February 16, 1981, a woman reported a rape and kidnapping to the police. She described her assailant and his car in some…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Taylor v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. UngerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. WilliamsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.