Worth v. McConnell
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Genesee. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.
This action was brought to recover the amount due upon the joint promissory note of Worth & Bartell, given in' part payment of a clover threshing machine purchased by Worth from the plaintiffs. The execution of the instrument sued upon was not denied in the pleadings.
The defense relied upon was that there was a warranty accompanying the sale of the threshing machine, a breach thereof, and a recoupment of the damages sustained in consequence of such breach.
To meet this defense the plaintiffs sought upon cross-examination of defendant Worth, when examined in his own behalf, to show that he had…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Vinton v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
- Deuel v. HigginsMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brackett v. MartensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Burtch v. Child, Hulswit & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Jones v. ArmstrongMontana Supreme Court · 1915
- J. A. Campbell Co. v. CorleyOregon Supreme Court · 1932