Legal Opinion

Deuel v. Higgins

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1861PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Genesee Circuit in Chancery.

1Opinion of the Court

Manning J.:

The bill is to foreclose a mortgage given by defendants Higgins and wife, to Thorne Deuel, and assigned by him to complainant. The other defendants are subsequent pur' *224chasers, against whom the bill has been taken as confessed-The defense of Higgins and wife is, that the mortgage was given to secure, in part, the purchase money of a steam engine and boiler, bought by Higgins of the mortgagee, with a warranty that the boiler would make steam sufficient to run one large upright saw for sawing logs into lumber. The engine and boiler had been used by the vendor for manufacturing lumber…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Davis v. OsborneArizona Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State ex rel. Meredith v. TallmanWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State v. ElliottUtah Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Whiting v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  5. People ex rel. Fuller v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API