Feitler v. LaChance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
This probate case concerns the interpretation of a holographic will. Appellant appeals from an order dated January 14, 1993, construing the will of decedent Janya Krokowsky as devising all of her property to Mary Brown. Appellant is a niece of the decedent, and under the express terms of the will was to receive only a token $100. Appellee is the *192conservator of the Estate of Mary Brown, a longtime, close friend of the testatrix and a beneficiary under the will. There is no dispute as to the authenticity or validity of the will. The meaning and effect of several…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Barnum v. Rural Fire Protection CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Newhall v. McGillArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Bank of America v. J. & S. AUTO REPAIRSArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Pass v. StephensArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Estate of BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wetherill v. BashamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Matter of Estate of KrokowskyArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Lanham v. FleenorIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Lanham v. FleenorIdaho Supreme Court · 2018