Legal Opinion

Feitler v. LaChance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 28, 1993No. 2 CA-CV 93-0277PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

This probate case concerns the interpretation of a holographic will. Appellant appeals from an order dated January 14, 1993, construing the will of decedent Janya Krokowsky as devising all of her property to Mary Brown. Appellant is a niece of the decedent, and under the express terms of the will was to receive only a token $100. Appellee is the *192conservator of the Estate of Mary Brown, a longtime, close friend of the testatrix and a beneficiary under the will. There is no dispute as to the authenticity or validity of the will. The meaning and effect of several…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barnum v. Rural Fire Protection CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  2. Newhall v. McGillArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Bank of America v. J. & S. AUTO REPAIRSArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Pass v. StephensArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Estate of BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wetherill v. BashamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. Matter of Estate of KrokowskyArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Lanham v. FleenorIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Lanham v. FleenorIdaho Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API