Legal Opinion

United States v. Pollard

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided April 1, 1992No. ACMR 9003250PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

De GIULIO, Senior Judge:

Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted *1010members. He was arraigned on two specifications of sodomy with a thirteen-year-old female child and one specification of indecent assault upon a six-year-old female child. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of one specification of indecent acts, as a lesser offense of one of the sodomy specifications, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ].1 He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. PollardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  2. United States v. HansenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  3. United States v. MartindaleU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. CarboU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  5. United States v. GeronimohernandezNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API