Tulsa Mid-Continent Oil & Gas Co. v. E. E. Tuttle & Son
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Washington County; R. H. Hudson, Judge. Action by E. E. Tuttle & Son, a copartnership composed of E. E. Tuttle and another, against the Tulsa Mid-Continent Oil & Gas Company, a corporation. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BRETT, C.
This action was commenced by the defendants in error in the district court of Washington county against the plaintiff in error to recover a-sum alleged to be due for work done under an alleged drilling contract. A trial was had, which resulted in a judgment for defendants in error, plaintiffs below, and to reverse this judgment an appeal has been perfected to this court.
The brief of plaintiff in error complies in no sense with rule No. 25 (38 Okla. x, 137 Pac. xi). There are no specifications of error complained of, as required by rule No. 25; no suggestion that the court…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Moore v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Williamson v. HumanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913