Legal Opinion

Valvo v. Seneca Nation of Indians

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rose H. Sconiers, J.

Defendants, Seneca Nation of Indians, L. Daniel Leroy and Valerie Henhawk, by notice of motion, seek an order dismissing plaintiffs’ Burt and Jean Valvo’s complaint. Defendants contend that, as a sovereign Indian Nation and representatives duly employed therein, they are immune from suit as, absent congressional consent, State law is not applicable to Indian tribes and Indian land. Plaintiffs resist this motion. Oral argument was had before this court, Part 32, Erie County Supreme Court; decision was reserved and counsel were requested to submit legal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Bowen v. DoyleDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1995
  3. United States v. CharlesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seneca v. SenecaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Spota v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API