Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided April 19, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, District Judge.

The defendant moves to dismiss the bill herein on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. The action is brought by the United States of America for and on its own behalf, and for and on behalf and as trustee and guardian of the Tonawanda Band of the Seneca Nation of Indians, to set aside a deed to the defendant pursuant to a sale ordered by the Supreme Court of the state of New York in partition proceedings with reference to certain property upon the Tonawanda Reservation. In addition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Patterson v. Council of the Seneca NationNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Mulkins v. . SnowNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. United States v. BoylanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bowen v. DoyleDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1995
  2. Fluent v. Salamanca Indian Lease AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  3. Andrews v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
  4. Fluent v. Salamanca Indian Lease AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. National Gypsum Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API