State v. Poole
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Judge MICHELE M. CHRISTIANSEN filed a separate opinion, in which Judge GREGORY K. ORME concurred.
Opinion
ROTH, Judge:
€ 1 Richard Shan Poole appeals the district court's order of restitution, arguing that the court lacked jurisdiction to enter it. We vacate the restitution order. }
BACKGROUND
12 Poole pleaded guilty to criminal mischief after he "drove his friend to a Rio Tinto location" so the friend could break in and "cause[ ] several thousands [of dollars] worth of damage to [Rio Tinto's] property." As part of the plea agreement, Poole agreed to "joint and several Hability for restitution."…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dolan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- West v. Thomson NewspapersUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Board of Education of the Granite School District v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- LPI Services and/or Travelers Indemnity Co. v. McGeeUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. RodriguesUtah Supreme Court · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Simper v. Board of Pardons ParoleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
- State v. SpeedCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- State v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015