Legal Opinion

Barfield v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 6, 1941No. A-9746PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

The defendant, L. L. Barfield, was by information charged in the county court of Rogers county with engaging for money, without a license, in a certain veterinary practice on October 27, 1937, was tried, convicted, and sentenced to- pay a fine of $50 and costs, from •which judgment and sentence he appeals to this court.

The defendant makes two1 contentions:(1) That the information was insufficient under the statute.(2) That the court erred in his instructions to the jury.

This action was brought under article 34, sec. 12, p. 104, Session Laws of 1936-1937, 59 Okla. St. Ann. § 687:

“It shall be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Sparkman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Sweat v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Staley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Walters v. Building Maintenance Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API