State v. Williamson

We quote from defendant’s brief :

“STATEMENT OP PACTS

“As indicated in the agreed narrative statement, defendant was indicted and convicted of ‘child molesting’ under Laws 1969, Chapter 655, now OHS 167.227. There was sufficient proof of all elements of the crime contained in the indictment, during the State’s case in chief.

“At the close of the State’s case, defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal upon the grounds that the statute was unconstitutional and void because the subject of the Act was not expressed in the title thereof, as required by Oregon Constitution, Article IY, Section 20 *…