Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 19, 1932No. 7705PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
The appellants, Eliza Murphy and Martha Nichols, each joined pro forma by her husband, sued appellees, W. S. Johnson, Yolley Johnson and wife, Lela Johnson, Stanley Benekenstein, F. L. Benekenstein, S. P. Benek-enstein, John M. Lewis, Albert Cotter Lewis, Mary L. Easthope, the Texas Company, a Texas corporation, the Texas Company, a Delaware corporation, Humble Oil & Refining Company, a Texas corporation, and Phillips Petroleum Company, an Oklahoma corporation, to recover an undivided one-half interest in two tracts of land, described in this appeal as tract No. 1 and tract No. 2. The…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Patty v. MiddletonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Oury v. SaundersTexas Supreme Court · 1890
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- KMI Continental Offshore Production Co. v. ACF Petroleum Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Neill v. Pure Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Gaston v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Dixon v. CargillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Moseley v. FikesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.