Legal Opinion

KMI Continental Offshore Production Co. v. ACF Petroleum Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided March 3, 1988No. 01-86-0054-CVPublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEVY, Justice.

KMI Continental Offshore Production Co. (“KMI”) and Florida Exploration Company (“Florida”) appeal from a summary judgment entered against them. The dispute centers around an oil and gas exploration agreement the parties entered into and whether KMI and Florida timely exercised an option available to them by the agreement. We hold that KMI and Florida did not timely exercise their option, and affirm the judgment.

On January 1, 1976, Florida, ACF Petroleum Co. (“ACF”), and Chessie Resources, Inc. (“Chessie”), 1 entered into an oil and gas exploration agreement called the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. City of Pinehurst v. Spooner Addition Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. McMahon v. ChristmannTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Alford, Meroney & Co. v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Hill v. Heritage Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
  2. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utility Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. Pegasus Energy Group, Inc. v. Cheyenne Petroleum Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
  4. America's Favorite Chicken Co. v. Samaras, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  5. First City National Bank of Midland v. Concord Oil Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1991

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API