Legal Opinion

Bilthouse v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 15, 2009No. 07-3593PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

Alan and Patricia Bilthouse seek to recover a tax refund on the basis that their shares of stock in a construction company became “worthless” in 1997 and were therefore “disposefd] of’ under 26 U.S.C. § 469(g). The government denied the re fund on the basis that the company became worthless in 1995 rather than 1997. The Bilthouses do not dispute that the company had no liquidating value in or after 1995 but contend that the company expected a large financial recovery from a lawsuit that would have allowed it to stay in business. Because the record does not demonstrate…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Boehm v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Breneisen v. Motorola, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Morton v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1938
  5. Morton v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Twenhafel v. State Auto Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Roger Twenhafel v. State Auto Property & CasualtyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API