Legal Opinion

United States v. Arnott

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 2, 2014No. 13-1881PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

After the district court denied his motion for suppression, defendant-appellant Paul Arnott entered a conditional guilty plea, see Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2), reserving his right to challenge the suppression ruling. Following the imposition of sentence, the defendant acted upon this reservation and appealed. Having given the matter due consideration, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

We rehearse the facts as found by the district court (explicitly or implicitly) at the suppression hearing, consistent with record support. See United States v. Gonzalez, 609 F.3d 13, 15 (1st Cir.2010).

This…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. Rivera-CarrasquilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Tiru-PlazaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. HinkleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. ArthurCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API