Legal Opinion

Rowan v. Inman

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice TomliNsoN

In the case at hand the relief sought by the executrix of the Ida Rowan Porter Estate is from a judgment of the County Court of McMinn County. By an amendment *146to the bill she particularly seeks this relief through the instrumentality of the writ of error coram nobis, sec. 27-702 T.C.A. This relief is sought — not in the County Court of McMinn County where that judgment was rendered — but in the Chancery Court of that County.

The writ of error coram nobis contemplates relief from the results of a given judgment only by proceedings in the particular court in which there was rendered judgment.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fine v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Hamilton v. WolfeTennessee Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harmon v. BryantTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. PriceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1970
  3. Ezell v. BuhlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API