Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Wolfe

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson

An automobile traffic accident resulted in a substantial jury verdict and judgment for respondents against petitioners. An appeal to the Court of Appeals was prayed and granted. Forty-five days were allowed within which to file bill of exceptions. It is conceded that this bill of exceptions was not filed within that time.

Petitioners subsequently filed in the Court of Appeals the record for writ of error. The bill of exceptions was included on the assumption that it was a part of the record.

On motion of respondents, the Court of Appeals struck the bill of exceptions from the record on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dunn v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Nashville Railway & Light Co. v. TrawickTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Cain v. CockeTennessee Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Simmons v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  2. McLaughlin v. BroylesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  3. Davis v. SadlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  4. King v. John A. Denies Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
  5. Rowan v. InmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API