Legal Opinion

Sweatman v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1929No. Docket No. 6241PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNELL, J., pro tem.

Plaintiffs, who are the surviving widow and minor children of one Robert Fulton Sweat-man, appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of respondent corporation upon the sustaining of its demurrer to the second amended complaint without leave to amend. Respondent was the sole defendant upon whom process was served. The action was to recover damages for the death of Sweatman resulting from an electric shock received by him from respondent’s high-voltage wires. The facts set forth in the pleading under discussion, so far as they appear material to the points involved on this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. Giraude v. Elec. Improvement Co. of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Perham v. Portland Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Commonwealth Electric Co. v. RoseIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Oakland Bank of Savings v. MurfeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. McCormick v. Great Western Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Harris v. JoffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hayden v. Paramount Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Holmes v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Revels v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API