Legal Opinion
Revels v. Southern California Edison Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 16, 1952No. Civ. 18954PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of nonsuit in an action for damages for the alleged wrongful death of her husband. The cause was tried on the issues made by the complaint and the answer of defendants R. Y. Mead, E. S. O’Donnell, and Mead & O’Donnell, a partnership, referred to as defendants.
The evidence and the inferences that may be reasonably drawn therefrom are stated in the light most favorable to plaintiff.
On June 24, 1948, defendants had a contract with the city of Beverly Hills, in which they had ■ agreed to construct a building. The contract provided that “said…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
- Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Broderick v. Cauldwell-Wingate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Dingman v. AF Mattock CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- GLARRATANO v. Weitz CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- VIRGINIA CHANCE v. Lawry's, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Kuntz v. Del E. Webb Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Johnson v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Beauchamp v. Los Gatos Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.