Elliott v. Galvin
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Order reversed, without costs, and the judgment of Special Term reinstated in the following memorandum: The record supports the finding that the location of the zoning lot within two different zoning districts, as well as the irregular shape and small size of the 01-9 portion of the zoning lot constitute such ‘1 unique physical conditions ’ ’ which allow the granting of & variance within the meaning of section 72-21 of the New York City Zoning Resolution. The record also discloses that the Board of Standards and Appeals has made all of the other findings required of it by section 72-21 of the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Kisil v. City of SanduskyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Croissant v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- 215 East 72nd Street Corp. v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Foster v. SaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Kettaneh v. Board of Standards & AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.