Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Sullins

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 18, 1996No. 96-1471PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

This lawyer discipline case was originally brought in three counts. The grievance commission determined one of them to be unfounded and on our de novo review of the record we agree. We hence proceed as if only two counts had been brought. As to these counts, we agree with the commission that the attorney should be publicly reprimanded.

Respondent Ray Sullins was admitted to practice in 1971, concentrating in recent years on family law with some emphasis on juvenile court. In 1986 he received a public reprimand by the ethics committee (now the Iowa supreme court board of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. PaulosSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. AplandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. HonkenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. RickabaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board, Vs. Thomas J. MccannSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Dean A. StowersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API