Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. Paulos
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
This lawyer disciplinary matter is before the court for our de novo review and final disposition in accordance with Iowa Supreme Court Rule 118.10. Having reviewed the record made before the Grievance Commission, we concur in its findings and recommendation that respondent’s license to practice law should be suspended.
The complaint against respondent Richard V. Paulos centers on his inaction in four probate matters. None of the facts are disputed. Two estate administrations, commenced by respondent in 1976 as attorney for the personal representatives, remain open after more…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. RogersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. BitterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. VesoleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. SilverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. MoonenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. FreemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. RameySupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. HauserSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. John D. HedgecothSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.