Legal Opinion

Young v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 4, 1997No. A97A1506PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Judge.

Willene Young and Melvin Young, individually and in their capacities as next friends of Crystal Fondren, appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of their uninsured motorist carrier, Maryland Casualty Company (Maryland Casualty). The Youngs contend that they are entitled to uninsured motorist benefits because the vehicle with which they collided was uninsured. Maryland Casualty sought summary judgment on grounds that the vehicle was not uninsured, and the trial court granted this motion. Because the other vehicle involved in the collision was not uninsured,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. American Protection Insurance v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Tinsley v. Worldwide InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Knight v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Crafter v. State Farm InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Thurman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Phillips v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Erturk v. Geico General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. Adams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API