Legal Opinion

Tinsley v. Worldwide Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 17, 1994No. A93A2553PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cooper, Judge.

Appellants John and Mary Tinsley brought an action against the City of Valdosta, the Valdosta Police Department and Officer Patricia Smith for injuries sustained by John Tinsley when his car collided with a police car which was following an ambulance through an intersection. Appellee was served with a copy of the complaint, presumably as appellants’ uninsured motorist carrier. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants based on sovereign and official immunity. No appeal was taken from the court’s order. Appellee then filed a motion for summary judgment which the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hennessy v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Logue v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  3. Wilkinson v. Vigilant Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  4. Hiers v. City of BarwickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  5. Boles v. HamrickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. West American Insurance v. PopaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Jenkins v. City of ElkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Allstate Insurance v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Fcci Insurance Company. v. McLendon Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API