Legal Opinion

Thurman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 14, 2003No. A02A1810PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Judge.

One way that Georgia uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM) coverage applies is when the tortfeasor’s available liability coverage is less than the victim’s total available UM coverage — to that extent, the tortfeasor is underinsured. In this case, the tortfeasor’s liability coverage exceeded the victim’s total UM coverage. But the victim’s recovery from the tortfeasor’s liability coverage was reduced by certain subrogation claims, so that the victim’s actual recovery was less than her total UM coverage. The issue before us is whether the victim’s UM coverage should cover the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Knight v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Young v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Landrum v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Merchant v. Canal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thurman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. Adams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Toomer v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. Adams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. Thurman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API