Legal Opinion

Bureau Veritas Commodities and Trade, Inc. v. Nanoo

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided November 10, 2021No. 2:20-cv-03374Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA BUREAU VERITAS COMMODITIES CIVIL ACTION AND TRADE, INC. VERSUS NO. 20-3374 RENISHA NANOO, ET AL. SECTION “R” (4) ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is defendant Renisha Nanoo’s partial motion to dismiss plaintiff’s second amended complaint1 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).2 Plaintiff Bureau Veritas Commodities and Trade, Inc. (“Bureau Veritas”) opposes the motion.3 For the following reasons, the Court denies defendant’s motion. I. BACKGROUND This claim arises from allegedly anti-competitive trade practices. In its…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lormand v. US Unwired, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  4. Brand Coupon Network, LLC v. Catalina Marketing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  5. Van Buren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API