Legal Opinion
Nalco Chemical Co. v. Hydro Technologies, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 16, 1993No. 92-C-412PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, Senior District Judge.
Presently before the court are five motions all filed by Nalco Chemical Company [Nalco]. They are: (1) Nalco’s “Motion Pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 60(B) for Relief from Court’s Partial Denial of Motion for Preliminary Injunction” [Rule 60(b) motion], (2) Nalco’s “Motion for Protective Order Pursuant to Rule 26(C)” [protective order motion], (3) Nalco’s “Motion to Compel Discovery” [motion to compel], (4) Nalco’s “Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint” [motion to amend], and (5) Nalco’s “6.01 Motion for Review of Defendants’…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- John Simmons Co. v. Grier Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Association of American Medical Colleges v. Princeton Review, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- In re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- La Calhene, Inc. v. SpolyarDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1996
- MQS Inspection, Inc. v. BieleckiDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1995
- In Re: Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb Litigation Mabel Brown George Burrell Wallace D. Cummins Sylvan C. Cohen K. Louise Jones James Lament Christopher S. Brown Cathlene Brown Craig Brown Margherita Barbetta Mary Retta Johnson Celeste Brown Clemmon Brown Cloyd Brown Curtis Brown John Ingram Mary Alice Knight William Butler Matthew CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000