MQS Inspection, Inc. v. Bielecki
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
RANDA, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff MQS Inspection, Inc.’s (“MQS”) motions for Preliminary Injunction, for Leave to Amend the Pleadings, to Consolidate, and for Summary Judgment and on defendants Richard Bielecki and William Orgas’ motions to Compel and for Summary Judgment. In their summary judgment motion, defendants further request that the Court impose sanctions against MQS pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. In its complaint, MQS raises two claims against defendants. First, MQS alleges that defendants violated the Uniform…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Curtis 1000, Incorporated v. Roy H. Suess and American Business Forms, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. BoeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Nalco Chemical Company v. Hydro Technologies, Incorporated, Daniel H. Girmscheid and Thomas S. BrogeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Hartford Elevator, Inc. v. LauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Burg v. Miniature Precision Components, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Regal-Beloit Corp. v. DrecollDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996