Legal Opinion
United States v. Francisco Corpus Maria Castillo, Movants-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 27, 2007No. 06-20619PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Circuit Judge:
Movants-appellants Francisco Corpus and Maria Castillo intervened in a criminal forfeiture proceeding pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n), asserting that they had an interest in real property subject to forfeiture and that their interest was superior to that of the defendant. They now appeal the district court’s final judgment of forfeiture, contending that the district court erred in concluding that their alleged interest in the real property was not superi- or to that of the defendant. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The instant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. ReckmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Armstrong v. American Home Shield Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Antonia Campos, Jose Campos, Milk-O-Mat, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Barbara Pacheco, United States of America v. John Serendensky, A/K/A John Vitolano, Joseph Foti & Guy FotiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Peterson v. City of Fort Worth, Tex.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Lyda Swinerton Builders, Inc. v. Okla. Sur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Fed. Ins. Co. v. United States, United States v. MazerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Thompson v. ConnickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- AUBRIS RESOURCES v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.