Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Connick

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 19, 2008No. 07-30443PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRADO, Circuit Judge:

In Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), the Supreme Court held that due process requires the prosecution in a criminal case to turn over evidence that is favorable to the accused when the evidence is material to guilt or punishment. The Supreme Court later expanded the Brady rule to require the disclosure of evidence that is relevant to the credibility of key government witnesses. See Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 154, 92 S.Ct. 763, 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972). In the criminal proceedings that prompted this lawsuit, it is undisputed…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Connick v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Limone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. Saldivar v. RodelaDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2012
  4. Baum v. RushtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  5. I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API