Hadix v. Johnson
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
ENSLEN, Chief Judge.
OPINION
These matters are before the Court on plaintiffs’ motions for attorneys’ fees for the time period between January 1, 1996 and December 81, 1996, filed on September 23, 1996, and April 14, 1997. The parties have resolved some of the issues with respect to attorneys’ fees, but disagree over the hourly rate to which plaintiffs’ counsel are entitled, and about certain hours for which plaintiffs’ counsel are requesting compensation.
FACTS
These cases have been consolidated on the issue of access to the courts. Plaintiffs in both cases have been awarded attorneys’ fees for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Darnell Cooper and Anthony Davis v. Michael CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- John L. Wright v. Terry L. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hadix v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Everett Hadix v. Perry M. Johnson, (96-1851/1908/1943), United States of America, Intervenor (96-1908/1943). United States of America v. State of Michigan, (96-1907)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998