Legal Opinion

Everett Hadix v. Perry M. Johnson, (96-1851/1908/1943), United States of America, Intervenor (96-1908/1943). United States of America v. State of Michigan, (96-1907)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1998No. 96-1851Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

144 F.3d 925

Everett HADIX, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Perry M. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants-Appellants (96-1851/1908/1943),

United States of America, Intervenor (96-1908/1943).

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al., Defendants-Appellants (96-1907).

Nos. 96-1851, 96-1943, 96-1907 and 96-1908.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued Feb. 4, 1997.

Decided May 20, 1998.

Susan Przekop-Shaw (argued and briefed), Michael A. Nickerson (briefed), Office of the Attorney General, Corrections Division, Lansing, MI, for Defendant-Appellant Perry Johnson in No.…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Moore; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API