Legal Opinion

TH. Goldschmidt A.G. v. Smith

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided August 24, 1984No. 01-84-0281-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUGGAN, Justice.

Original Proceeding on Writ of Mandamus

Relator, TH. Goldschmidt A.G., seeks a writ of mandamus from this court to compel the Honorable R.L. “Bob” Smith, Judge of the 165th District Court of Harris County, Texas, to vacate his discovery order for production of documents and taking of depositions. This court has jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus by virtue of the legislative amendments to Tex.Rev.Civ. StatAnn. art. 1824 (Vernon Supp.1984).

This proceeding arises from the case of The Upjohn Company v. Goldschmidt Chemical Corporation, et al, wherein plaintiff brought…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Superior Ct.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Pierburg GmbH & Co. KG v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Murphy v. Reifenhauser KG MaschinenfabrikDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1984
  5. Lasky v. Continental Products Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gebr. Eickhoff Maschinenfabrik Und Eisengieberei mbH v. StarcherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Societe Nat. Ind. Aero. v. US Dist. CourtSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Sandsend Financial Consultants, Ltd. v. Wood, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  4. Muqtasid Abdul Qadir v. Malcom Wise, Justin Willis, Arlene Franco, Cody Miller, and Mohamed Sarhani, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018
  5. Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court for the Southern District of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API