Legal Opinion

Pierburg GmbH & Co. KG v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 5, 1982No. Civ. 65767PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS, P. J.

By petition for mandate a West German national corporation, Pierburg GmbH Co. KG (hereafter Pierburg), which is a defendant in the underlying personal injury products liability action in respondent court, seeks to vacate respondent’s order of June 9, 1982, that requires Pierburg to answer written interrogatories served upon it by plaintiffs (real parties in interest) without compliance with the Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil and Commercial Matters (23 U.S.T. 2555, T.I.A.S. No. 7444, codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1781) (hereafter the Hague Evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Superior Ct.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Dr. Ing HCF Porsche AG v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Coopman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Compagnie Francaise d'Assurance Pour le Commerce Exterieur v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  2. Robert J. Boreri v. Fiat S.P.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  3. Gebr. Eickhoff Maschinenfabrik Und Eisengieberei mbH v. StarcherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Graco, Inc. v. Kremlin, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  5. In Re Anschuetz & Co., GmbhCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API