In Re the Marriage of Timmons
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, C.J.
Is a judge in a proceeding to modify an uncontested dissolution decree limited to evidence of postdecree facts showing a change of circumstances since the time of the decree? We conclude that when a dissolution is uncontested, a judge may consider predecree facts. The order in this case, which considered predecree facts is supported by substantial evidence and was therefore properly entered.
Petitioner Wendy Timmons (now Wendy Rolleston) and Elmer Timmons separated in June 1977 after 12 years of marriage. They agreed that their two children, now ages 9 and 6, would remain in the family home…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strenge v. ClarkeWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Rankin v. FerriterWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Publishers Forest Products Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- White v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Brim v. StruthersWashington Supreme Court · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- King County v. Taxpayers of King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Wetch v. WetchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Matter of Marriage of LuckeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- In re the Marriage of AkonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- In re the Marriage of ShoemakerWashington Supreme Court · 1995
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.