Legal Opinion

Fields Corp. v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 10, 2002No. 26325-4-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

Fields Corporation sought equitable relief from res judicata. The trial court granted such relief, and we affirm.

Under Washington’s Industrial Insurance Act, an employer has the option of enrolling in what the Department of Labor and Industries refers to as a “retrospective rating program.”1 An employer who selects that option pays a standard industrial insurance premium for the ensuing coverage year. At the end of that year, the Department retrospectively calculates the premium that the employer should have paid according to the employer’s actual claim experience; compares the retrospective…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Northwest Independent Forest Manufacturers v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  3. Kingery v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Kingery v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Lejeune v. Clallam CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. KUSTURA v. Department of Labor and IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. Pearson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. Chavez v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Chavez v. L&ICourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Chunyk & Conley/Quad-C v. BrayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API