Kinnison v. Kinnison
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Chief Justice.
This appeal has as its genesis the breakup of a nonmarital living arrangement. The district court awarded the plaintiff, Lorena Kinnison, $15,000 by way of enforcing a settlement contract with the defendant, Allan Kinnison. Mr. Kinnison has appealed, claiming that there was no express contract of settlement and, further, that Wyoming law prohibits an award upon the dissolution of a nonmarital relationship.
We will hold that the district court correctly found that there was an enforceable oral contract for the settlement of claims between the parties and will affirm.
THE FACTS
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Willis v. WillisWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- Beal v. BealOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Peters Grazing Association v. LegerskiWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Roberts v. RobertsWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Carroll v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Bereman v. BeremanWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Blumenthal v. BrewerIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
- Boland v. CatalanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. FickerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.