Legal Opinion

Noble v. Landry

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 22, 1929No. 29534PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff sued for separation from bed and board; defendant joined issue and reconvened for the same relief. The trial judge rejected both demands, and both parties have appealed.

Plaintiff has filed a motion in this court to "discontinue this suit."

The motion, as a motion to discontinue, comes too late. A plaintiff may indeed discontinue his suit if so minded (though not to the prejudice of a reconventional demand), but he must do so before judgment is rendered in the court below. Code Prac. arts. 491, 532; Trenchard v. N.O. Ry. Lt. Co., 123 La. 36, 40, 48 So. 575.

On the other hand, if…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Succession of TrouillySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
  2. Trenchard v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Womack v. VarnadoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  2. Birdow v. MidyettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Diamond T. Motor Trucks, Inc. v. Bilich.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API