Legal Opinion

Diamond T. Motor Trucks, Inc. v. Bilich.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1936No. 16376Published

1Opinion of the Court

McCALEB, Judge.

Plaintiff sued the defendant on a promissory note. The answer admits all of the allegations of the petition, but there is a reconventional demand filed for the sum of $205.60, in which it is claimed that the note held by the plaintiff was given in payment of the purchase price of a truck sold by the plaintiff to the defendant, and that the truck, at the time of the sale, was not in good running order, and that, as a result, defendant was subjected to the expense of certain repairs and otherwise damaged.

The trial court found for the plaintiff in the amount sued for and dismissed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Noble v. LandrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  2. Witbeck v. WitbeckSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  3. Hennen v. HennenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API