Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. Wedgworth
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
Defendant’s pleas 3 and 4 set up plaintiff’s failure to pay the license tax required by the act of September 30, 1919 (Gen. Acts 1919, p. 1077), for keeping a dog; the theory of the pleas being that such failure deprived the dog of its status as property, and nullified the owner’s right of action for the injury complained of.
The Dog Law of 1919, above referred to, requires the owner or keeper of every dog to have him annually registered, and to pay an annual registration fee, as provided, and to procure an identification tag to be worn by the dog. It is further declared to be unlawful for any…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parker v. MiseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
- Crowder v. Fletcher & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Beale v. PoseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Southern Ry. Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Dickerman v. Consolidated Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Scharfeld v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Southern Ry. Co. v. CatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. CoxeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.