Legal Opinion
Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. Smith
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 26, 1923No. 6 Div. 855PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
The action is for the negligent killing of plaintiff’s dog by the defendant railroad company.
Besides the general issue, defendant pleaded specially as follows:
“The plaintiff himself was guilty of negligence that proximately contributed to the death of his dog in this: Plaintiff knew that said dog had a roving, rambling disposition, and that said dog frequented the defendant’s railroad track and was liable to be struck by passing trains, and, notwithstanding said knowledge, plaintiff negligently failed to do anything to prevent said dog from being upon or dangerously near defendant’s railroad…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Home Insurance Co. of New York v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Gulp, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Mobile & Ohio R. R. v. Christian Moerlein Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Alabama City G. & A. Ry. Co. v. LumpkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Beasley v. Linehan Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Southern Ry. Co. v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Davis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Norwood Hospital v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Ex Parte Alabama Marble Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.