Legal Opinion

People v. Harden

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 29, 1966No. Gen. 10,701PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTrapp, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction upon a plea of guilty to an information charging pandering, upon which plea a sentence of 2 to 5 years in the penitentiary was imposed. Defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment, or in the alternative, for a new trial, was denied.

Upon this appeal it is urged that defendant’s prosecution was not consistent with due process of law and fundamental fairness in that: (1) the trial court accepted an unknowing and involuntary waiver of defendant’s right to counsel; (2) the trial court accepted an unknowing and involuntary waiver of defendant’s right to be tried…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. The People v. RileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1941

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. KrantzIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  2. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. People v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. CarterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  5. People v. HickmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API