Legal Opinion
State v. Harrell
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 25, 1986No. 11852PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The defendant, Willie L. Harrell, was convicted, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree with a firearm, in violation of General *257Statutes § 53a-102a,1 and attempted robbery in the first degree, in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 (a)2 and 53a-134 (a) (4).3 The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction on these charges.
The defendant raises three issues on appeal. He claims that: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion in limine to prevent impeachment by the use of evidence of prior convictions; (2) the ruling on the motion in limine…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. PinnockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1990
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.