City of Ashland v. Heck's, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
PALMORE, Judge.
The core question in this case is whether the Sunday closing law, KRS 436.160, can be enforced against a department store, or so-called “discount house,” while other establishments variously denominated as “pharmacies” or “drug stores,” “groceries,” “supermarkets” and “car washes,” some of which sell many of the same types of mer*422chandise as the discount house, are openly permitted to do business as usual on Sunday. Obedient to the precept of Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 6 S.Ct. 1064, 30 L.Ed. 220 (1886), the chancellor adjudged such enforcement to be unlawfully…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- McAfee v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Arlan's Department Store of Louisville v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
- City of Covington v. GausepohlCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. MoralesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Murgia v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- E & T Realty v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Caldor's, Inc. v. Bedding Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Kentucky Milk Marketing & Antimonopoly Commission v. Kroger Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.