Baker v. Margaret L.
California Court of Appeal
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
RYLAARSDAM, J,, Concurring and Dissenting.
I concur in the decision to affirm the trial court’s judgment in this case. However, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion an appellate court must conduct an independent review of the record in an appeal from a conservatorship proceeding under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5000 et seq.; all further statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code) if appointed counsel files a brief failing to raise any issues.
Under Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493] and People…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re Sade C.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Conservatorship of RouletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.