Legal Opinion
Gerhardt v. Continental Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided December 19, 1966PublishedCited by 132 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Jacobs, J.
The trial court dismissed the insured Gerhardt’s claim that her comprehensive homeowner’s policy covered a workmen’s compensation proceeding by a residence employee injured while working at the insured’s home. The Appellate Division affirmed in a per curiam based on Gordon v. New Hampshire Ins. Co., 89 N. J. Super. 246 (1965). We granted certification in both Gerhardt and Gordon but Gordon has since been settled and is not now before us. 46 N. J. 315 (1966).
In 1963 the plaintiff purchased a homeowner’s policy which was issued to her in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Frommeyer v. L. & R. Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Washington Theatre Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
3Cited by132 opinions
- Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- National Mutual Insurance v. McMahon & Sons, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- Right to Choose v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. PitroloWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
- Zacarias v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.