Legal Opinion
People v. Hurley
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 10, 1936No. Crim. 329PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
By an information filed by the district attorney of San Bernardino County the appellant and his brother, H. B. Hurley, were accused of the crime of manslaughter. Appellant was further accused of failing to stop and render aid after an accident. (Sec. 480, Vehicle Code.) The two cases were tried together, and upon the same evidence, by the court without a jury. H. B. Hurley was found not guilty. R. B. Hurley was found guilty on both charges. The latter has appealed from the judgments and from the orders denying his motions for new trial. We will refer to him as the appellant, and to H. B.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schultz v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. GoetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. ZerneckeSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. PennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. BolsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- State v. McMahanIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- People v. BernhardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.