Aikens v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
The special grounds of the motion for new trial are abandoned in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error. The evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis, save the guilt of the accused. Whittemore v. State, 36 Ga. App. 299 (136 S. E. 806); Lamb v. State, 36 Ga. App. 306 (136 S. E. 306); Wynn v. State, 38 Ga. App. 262 (143 S. E. 599); Williams v. State, 41 Ga. App. 351 (152 S. E. 911); Johnson v. State, 41 Ga. App. 327 (152 S. E. 920); Craig v. State, 41 Ga. App. 225 (152 S. E. 494); Cook v. State, 33 Ga. App. 571 (2) (127 S. E. 156);…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Wynn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Hale v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Lamb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Corbin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Weehunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Zetterower v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.