Cook v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.
1. In a prosecution for the offense of 'having intoxicating liquors, alleged to have been committed on a specified date within the statute of limitations, the State is not restricted in its proof to the date so alleged, but may make out its ease by proof that the alleged oSense was committed on that date or on any other date or dates within two years prior to the filing of the indictment or accusation. Holmes v. State, 7 Ga. App. 570 (3) (67 S. E. 693). The accused is protected *572against a subsequent prosecution for any such offense, whether the original charge, on the trial thereof, was or was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Calhoun v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Nobles v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Craig v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Holmes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Corbin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Ealey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.